the new american gun logic

 So it has come to this,let`s ignore the fact that this year has seen more die in mass shootings.here is what the NRA wants you to believe,if there were more people armed there would not be as many shootings.it is a new play on the guns don`t kill people logic.lets arm more people.here a twist on the Connecticut shooting,all teachers should be armed.why stop there?why not say that all children who go to school must carry at least three forms of weapons?like an assault weapon,shotgun or two semi automatic pistols?that would cut down on school violence.never mind that everyone was a armed in the old west and that never worked.i can not understand how anyone can hear that 6 or 7 year old got shot multiple times and say we need to loosen gun laws and make everyone armed.i still am trying to figure out what people are so damn afraid of that they need assault weapons with 30 to 100 round clips.is this what this nation has become?a nation of my gun is bigger than yours?have we become a nation if your not armed then it is your fault you got shot?because that is what the if a person who was armed had been there sounds like to me.so keep your NRA blood money propaganda to yourself.

scenseless gun laws

 lets start with the best - ban all assault weapons.then,lets ban ammo clips that carry over 10 shots.lets do a mental background check.i am not saying ban all guns.that will never happen in the united states.lets make good gun laws and do it right.no one needs a .50 caliber semi-automatic riffle.no one needs a riffle with a ammo clip of 20 or,in extreme cases 100 rounds.and all persons wanting a gun should complete a mental evaluation.and should take 10 hrs of gun training.and lets make it where someone is suspected of having a mental problem be checked,and if they refuse,seize their guns.there are some who say we need more weapons.i say that is pure madness.this guy had a vest.all that would have happened is he would have killed them,took there weapon,and had another gun and more ammo.there have been too many mass shootings in the united states.how many more will die in senseless violence before the nra gets that it is not a good thing to have more weapons?they make big bucks off the blood in the streets.they are a biased party.there voice needs to be took with a grain of salt.we the people need our voice heard in Washington.this is what happens when corporations have bigger voices than the citizens.the blood is on there hands,they need to take meaningful action,this includes you Mr.President.

we need to stop our sick,violent culture.

 our culture is sick,twisted.people now justify violence .if i am angry i have the right to push you in front of a subway train or shoot you,or stab you.and we say,oh,well,and walk away.evil is alive and well.today is proof.i do not know or care what the gunman though.there is never any justification.we need to stop bickering and being aggressive.it has become accepted behavior.but,it shows how sick we have become.what are we scared of?we as a country now have more weapons than the rest of the world,in fact we have 10times as many as the rest of the world.and yet the u.s is only 5% of the world`s population.we have become neurotic.and paranoid.we build safe houses and bunkers.we buy guns we do not need.who are we scared of?the government?please,they have no backbone.the UN?they are powerless.so who?we are afraid of our own shadow.we now what we are thinking and we impose this on this shapeless menace .and we arm our self.for we do not know where this shadowy figure is hiding.we need to take a step back,take a deep breath and take a good long look in the mirror.we know something is wrong.and we should not be surprised when their is someone who cracks under the pressure of the shadow.we need to try to stop it.and confront our self.and let go of some of these weapons.this year we have had a year of incredible year of mass killings.and we need to face reality.and stand up and stop acting like brutes.

why union`s are still needed

 If you know history ,then you know why union`s formed.during the late 1800`s the barons of oil,steel,banking..etc.had made the workplace unsafe.workers worked 16 hours a day 6 days a week.accidents climbed ,and you could easily have foreseen that with the work environment at the time,a few would be deadly.if that was not enough,the workers got paid next to nothing.so,some grouped together and formed unions.but,the baron`s of the day would not allow this,they hired their own private armies to break them up,and they did not mind shooting unarmed civilians.when this happened,(by the way this happened as shown on the men who built America with carnage.)they govenerour called out the national guard.but,this happened several times.
 since then,most workers have better wages,and more free time.but,the barons are back.and they are getting revenge.they have complete control over the republican and tea baggers.they have pressed through laws that have essentially outlawed unions rights.and there dream is an America where you work 18 hrs a day for 6 days a week,where children work for nothing,and you get paid bare minimum.and,of course,the rich get laws protecting them from lawsuits,and being held responsible.and,they pay lower taxes then the barons who built America by blood of the workers.
 yes,there are cases where unions went to far.but if you really look into things like hostess,the unions took pay cuts,and other concessions,while management got greedy,and took more and more money .they are what destroyed the company.this business model was first used by bain capital,buy a company,throw it in deep debt,make workers take pay cuts,and when it goes under,get a big going away pay check.this is no longer capitalism.it`s richalism.a new reverse communism.and they are willing to sacrifice the united states to get it.after all,they will get paid one way or the other.

Bob costas,Gun culture

 Poor bob costas,he dared say the truth on prime time .we as a nation have gone gun crazy.there are kids carrying semi automatic weapons killing other kids,there are maniacs going to movies killing 100`s.but,hey it is not guns.it is the ole guns don`t kill people.that is about as stupid as you can get.yes,guns kill people.that is why there are semi automatic,and assault riffles.and why?why is it so dogmatic not to talk about some kind of gun control?no,a normal person has no need for a gun with a cartridge that carries 100 rounds.please,,if argue for this,i assume you are planning something.i am not nor should anyone argue for all guns to be taken.but,given there are more guns than people,lets at least stop making some kinds for the civilian population.here is a good example.the .50 calibure handgun and riffle.an average person does not need this.this is a weapon of mass destruction..all i am saying is there is good logic to have some kind of restrictions.
  then there is the Facebook argument,criminals do obey the law.true.but,if we outlaw certain things from being made,they will slowly fade out.and here is a big point,are we willing to wait to some Rambo a hole to get one of the really high cal.guns with a large amount of ammo kill over 200 before we decide?but who am i kidding,nothing will happen if that does happen.the NRA will say now is not the time to talk about it.
 and,here is the worst case scenario,a criminal with a high cal.weapon with over 300 rounds walks in somewhere and begins shooting,and some john Wayne wanna be returns fire,between the two you will have at least 100 dead.and wither not john Wayne wins,chances are ,one of his stray bullets will hit someone.

domestic violence

 Domestic violence cost all of us.there is the children,who are always suffering.and they need and should get some sort of treatment to help them realize it is not there fraught.then there are the spouses.women are more likely then men to be abused,and are more likely to be killed.i can tell you,because of my brother,that the abuse can have lifelong affects,which may lead to your death.my brother,was vicious to my sister-in -law.he beat her,treated her worse than a dog.when i stood up,he simply did not allow me near,nor did he come around.but,whats worse is the way he did his children.he beat them like you would a drunk.and now,20 odd years later,i and my mom,are left to clean up his mess with his children.all have depression.but,now,there mother has died.and a part of me with her,for i never saw such a sad and horrible tale.she was abused as a child,so she ended up with an abusive husband,he abused their kids.my only hope is that i may have,some influence to where their kids will not do the same.
 Men,if you can not be with a woman without hitting her,leave.and be a man and support your kids,no matter what you feel towards your wife,the children are innocent and are a part of you.Women,if he beats you,abuses you,get out,not tomorrow,now.it will not get better,the more you allow it,the worse they get.and,please do it before something bad happens to you,him,or to your kids.a man that beats his wife is not a man,he is a boy who cannot control his temper.and you cannot change behavior.this week,we saw the tragic end to a cycle of domestic abuse.now,that 3 month old has been robbed of everything.i do not feel for the man,i feel for the family.and most for the baby.women,look ,see,this could have been you.

the fiscal cliff

 W e all have heard the news,we all know the drill.but,within this partisan  bickering,something else could come up.many have unknowingly posted this on there Facebook page.it is an obscure article in the constitution that,during times of extreme distress on our nation,a president can use .this clause,for which many preachers have devoted sermons to,would give a siting president absolute power.with or with out congress.only  one president in the history of these united states has used it.Abraham Lincoln.but,recently,there was a president who,considered using it to suspend elections indefinably.i will not give his name.he used a poor idea to try to use it.he however ,was but this time,one of the most hated presidents in our history.and doing so would have sparked a civil war.now,with this cliff however it could be used.but,should it?well,congress has been split since Obama was elected.even when he did what republicans wanted,they voted it down.in essence,they are getting paid to sit and argue.most recently,senator john McCain,of which i have a lot of respect for,decided to sit and use the media to spin the gop agenda on Benghazi,but in doing so,missed the hearing on Benghazi.which goes directly to my point.the gop has been sitting around arguing for facts they themselves have not agreed with ,sat in front of the media ,and done nothing.all they are doing is getting paid to sit,they say they want to help this nation.but even when they get what they so furiously argued for,they vote against it.so,it is my view,regrettably,that this clause may be the only way to advert a serious,and disastrous fall.of,course,the gop will argue that this was his plan.but,they also tried it.and they are the real reason we are here.so,to the gop ,i at one time was a full backer,voted gop.now,i am ashamed of the party i once liked.either compromise and allow the richest to pay more,or allow the president to do what he must.but,do not keep pushing and daring the rest of the government to bow down to you like your kings.